Textus Originalis

ITINERARIUM BURDIGALENSE

Wess. 613, 8 civitas Spolitio mil. VII 9 mutatio Sacraria mil. VIII 10 civitas Trevis mil. IIII 11 civitas Fulginis mil. V 614, 1 civitas Foro Flamini mil. III 2 civitas Noceria mil. XII 3 civitas Ptanias mil. VIII 4 mansio Herbello mil. VII 5 mutatio Ad Hesis mil. X 6 mutatio Ad Cale mil. XIIII 7 mutatio Intercisa mil. VIIII 615, 1 civitas Foro Semproni mil. VIIII 2 mutatio Ad Octavo mil. VIIII 3 civitas Fano Furtunae mil. VIII 4. 5 civitas Pisauro mil. XXIIII 6 usque Ariminum 7 mutatio Conpetu mil. XII 8 civitas Cesena mil. VI 616, 1 civitas Foro Populi mil. VI 2 civitas Foro Livi mil. VI 3 civitas Faventia mil. X 4 civitas Foro Corneli mil. X 5 civitas Claterno mil. XIII 6 civitas Bononia mil. X Wess. 616, 7 mutatio Ad Medias mil. XV 8 mutatio Victoriolas mil. X 9 civitas Mutena mil. III 10 mutatio Ponte Secies mil. V 11 civitas Regio mil. VIII 12 mutatio Canneto mil. X 13 civitas Parme mil. VIII 14 mutatio Ad Tarum mil. VII 15 mansio Fidentiae mil. VIII 16 mutatio Ad Fonteclos mil. VIII 17 civitas Placentia mil. XIII 617, 1 mutatio Ad Rota mil. XI 2 mutatio Tribus Tabernis mil. V 3 civitas Laude mil. VIII 4 mutatio Ad Nonum mil. VII 5 civitas Mediolanum mil. VII 6 fit omnis summa ab urbe Roma Mediolanium 7 usque milia CCCCXVI, 8 mutationes XLIIII, mansiones XXIIII. 9 Explicit itinerarium.

613, 8 IIII 9—614, 1 XVIIII aut XVIII 614, 2 Nuceria 4 Helvillo 615, 3 Fortunae 4. 5 VIII; quem numerum pari versus antecedentis deceptus librarius omisit et perperam XXIIII ab Arimino huc traxit. 6 civitas Ariminum mil. XXIIII 7—8 XX 616, 1—2 XIII aut XIIII 1 Foro Popili 7 XII 10—11 XVII 12 Tanneto 16—17 XXIIII aut XXV 617, 5 VIIII 7 CCCCXXXIII — CCCCXXXVI. Numeri collecti efficiunt CCCCXXI, qua ex summa et CCCCXVI P et CCCCXCI V haud gravibus corruptelis ortae esse possunt. Sed CCCCXVI P etiam cum eiusdem codicis numeris mendosis collectis (CCCCXVII) paene congruit. 8 Arimino adiecto sunt mutationes XLVIII, mansiones XXVIII. Sed summae traditae XLIIII, XLII et XXIIII, XXXIIII, quoniam ab XLVII et XXVIII potius originem duxere quam ab XLVIII et XXVIII, computatae videntur postquam versus 615, 4—6 corrupti sunt.

Traduzione

THE BORDEAUX ITINERARY

Wess. 613, 8 civitas Spolitio, miles VII 9 mutatio Sacraria, miles VIII 10 civitas Trevis, miles IIII 11 civitas Fulginis, miles V 614, 1 civitas Foro Flamini, miles III 2 civitas Noceria, miles XII 3 civitas Ptanias, miles VIII 4 mansio Herbello, miles VII 5 mutatio Ad Hesis, miles X 6 mutatio Ad Cale, miles XIIII 7 mutatio Intercisa, miles VIIII 615, 1 civitas Foro Semproni, miles VIIII 2 mutatio Ad Octavo, miles VIIII 3 civitas Fano Furtunae, miles VIII 4. 5 civitas Pisauro, miles XXIIII 6 as far as Ariminum 7 mutatio Conpetu, miles XII 8 civitas Cesena, miles VI 616, 1 civitas Foro Populi, miles VI 2 civitas Foro Livi, miles VI 3 civitas Faventia, miles X 4 civitas Foro Corneli, miles X 5 civitas Claterno, miles XIII 6 civitas Bononia, miles X Wess. 616, 7 mutatio Ad Medias, miles XV 8 mutatio Victoriolas, miles X 9 civitas Mutena, miles III 10 mutatio Ponte Secies, miles V 11 civitas Regio, miles VIII 12 mutatio Canneto, miles X 13 civitas Parme, miles VIII 14 mutatio Ad Tarum, miles VII 15 mansio Fidentiae, miles VIII 16 mutatio Ad Fonteclos, miles VIII 17 civitas Placentia, miles XIII 617, 1 mutatio Ad Rota, miles XI 2 mutatio Tribus Tabernis, miles V 3 civitas Laude, miles VIII 4 mutatio Ad Nonum, miles VII 5 civitas Mediolanum, miles VII 6 the whole total from the city Rome as far as Mediolanium 7 is 416 miles, 8 mutations XLIIII, mansiones XXIIII. 9 Here ends the itinerary.

613, 8 IIII 9—614, 1 XVIIII or XVIII 614, 2 Nuceria 4 Helvillo 615, 3 Fortunae 4. 5 VIII; the scribe, misled by the number of the preceding line, omitted this number and wrongly brought the XXIIII from Ariminum here. 6 civitas Ariminum, miles XXIIII 7—8 XX 616, 1—2 XIII or XIIII 1 Foro Popili 7 XII 10—11 XVII 12 Tanneto 16—17 XXIIII or XXV 617, 5 VIIII 7 CCCCXXXIII — CCCCXXXVI. The sum of the individual figures gives CCCCXXI, from which total both CCCCXVI of P and CCCCXCI of V could have arisen through not very serious corruptions. But CCCCXVI of P also almost agrees with the sum of the corrupt figures of that same manuscript (CCCCXVII). 8 With Ariminum added, there are mutations XLVIII, mansiones XXVIII. But the transmitted totals XLIIII, XLII and XXIIII, XXXIIII, since they seem to have originated from XLVII and XXVIII rather than from XLVIII and XXVIII, appear to have been calculated after lines 615, 4—6 were corrupted.