Textus Originalis
ITINERARIUM PROVINCIARUM
Wess. 217, 5 Item per ripam a Viminacio Nicomediam m. p. XI LXII, sic: 7 Cuppe m. p. XXIIII 218, 1 Novas m. p. XXIIII 2 Talia m. p. XII 3 Egeta m. p. XXI 4 Aquis m. p. XVI 219, 1 Dortico m. p. X 2 Bononia m. p. XVII 3 Ratiaria leg. XIIII GG. m. p. XVIII 4 Almo m. p. XVIII 220, 1 Cebro m. p. XVIII 2 Augustis m. p. XVIII 3 Variana m. p. XII 4 Valeriana m. p. XII 5 Oesco leg. V Mac. m. p. XII 221, 1 Uto m. p. XIIII 2 Securisca m. p. XII 3 Dimo m. p. XII 4 Novas leg. I Ital. m. p. XVI 222, 1 Scaidava m. p. XVIII Wess. 222, 2 Trimammio m. p. VII 3 Sexantapristis m. p. XII 4 Tigra m. p. VIIII 5 Appiaria m. p. XIII 223, 1 Transmariscam m. p. XVI 2 Candidiana m. p. XIII 3 Teclicio m. p. XII 4 Dorostoro leg. XI Cl. m. p. XII 224, 1 Sucidava m. p. XVIII 2 Axiupoli m. p. XII 3 Capidava m. p. XVIII 4 Carso m. p. XVIII 5 Cio m. p. X 225, 1 Biroe m. p. XIIII 2 Trosmis leg. I Iovia m. p. XVIII 3 Scytica 4 Arrubio m. p. VIIII 5 Diniguttia m. p. VIIII 226, 1 Novioduno leg. II Herculea m. p. XX 2 Aegiso m. p. XXIIII 3 Salsovia m. p. XVII 4 Salmorude m. p. VIIII 5 Vale Domitiana m. p. XVII
217, 6 sunt fere MCLXXXVI. Summa D (= MCLXII), quia non solum cum numeris singulis in textum receptis, sed etiam cum eius codicis numeris mendosis accurate congruit, num archetypo tribuenda sit, dubito. Summa P (= MCCLXXII) ex eius libri numeris fortasse subducta est quo tempore 218, 2; 219, 2; 225, 1 et 4 nondum erant corrupti, recepto quoque ex errore in computum 223, 4 CL. Quae si in rationem induxeris MCCLXXIII habebis. Summa prior L (= MCCXLIIII) quomodo confecta sit, non video. I CXXXII accurate convenit cum numeris 1L lacunis duabus imminutis. 218, 1 XII 2 Taliata XXIIII 219, 3 Gemina 223, 3 Teglicio 224, 1 corrige: Sagadava m. p. XVIII Sucidava m. p. XII 2 XVII 225, 3 Scythia sc. provincia 4 Arubio 226, 5 Valle Domitiana
Traduzione
English — scholarly
ARETHE Knowledge Engineering DivisionITINERARY OF THE PROVINCES
Wess. 217, 5 Also along the bank from Viminacio to Nicomediam, m.p. I LXII, as follows: 7 Cuppe, m.p. XXIIII 218, 1 Novas, m.p. XXIIII 2 Talia, m.p. XII 3 Egeta, m.p. XXI 4 Aquis, m.p. XVI 219, 1 Dortico, m.p. X 2 Bononia, m.p. XVII 3 Ratiaria, legio XIIII Gemina, m.p. XVIII 4 Almo, m.p. XVIII 220, 1 Cebro, m.p. XVIII 2 Augustis, m.p. XVIII 3 Variana, m.p. XII 4 Valeriana, m.p. XII 5 Oesco, legio V Macedonica, m.p. XII 221, 1 Uto, m.p. XIIII 2 Securisca, m.p. XII 3 Dimo, m.p. XII 4 Novas, legio I Italica, m.p. XVI 222, 1 Scaidava, m.p. XVIII Wess. 222, 2 Trimammio, m.p. VII 3 Sexantapristis, m.p. XII 4 Tigra, m.p. VIIII 5 Appiaria, m.p. XIII 223, 1 Transmariscam, m.p. XVI 2 Candidiana, m.p. XIII 3 Teclicio, m.p. XII 4 Dorostoro, legio XI Claudia, m.p. XII 224, 1 Sucidava, m.p. XVIII 2 Axiupoli, m.p. XII 3 Capidava, m.p. XVIII 4 Carso, m.p. XVIII 5 Cio, m.p. X 225, 1 Biroe, m.p. XIIII 2 Trosmis, legio I Iovia, m.p. XVIII 3 Scytica 4 Arrubio, m.p. VIIII 5 Diniguttia, m.p. VIIII 226, 1 Novioduno, legio II Herculea, m.p. XX 2 Aegiso, m.p. XXIIII 3 Salsovia, m.p. XVII 4 Salmorude, m.p. VIIII 5 Vale Domitiana, m.p. XVII
217, 6 are approximately MCLXXXVI. Since the total of D (= MCLXII) agrees accurately not only with the sum of the individual figures admitted into the text, but also with the corrupt figures of that manuscript, I doubt whether it is to be attributed to the archetype. The total of P (= MCCLXXII) was perhaps calculated from the figures of that book at a time when 218, 2; 219, 2; 225, 1 and 4 were not yet corrupt, and also erroneously included in the calculation the CL at 223, 4. If you include these in the reckoning, you will have MCCLXXIII. I do not see how the first total of L (= MCCXLIIII) was made up. I CXXXII agrees accurately with the figures of 1L, diminished by two lacunae. 218, 1 XII 2 Taliata XXIIII 219, 3 Gemina 223, 3 Teglicio 224, 1 emend to: Sagadava m.p. XVIII Sucidava m.p. XII 2 XVII 225, 3 Scythia sc. provincia 4 Arubio 226, 5 Valle Domitiana
Commentario Arethe
Final Asia Minor routes (Wess. 230–240)
Page 32 completes the Anatolian section and begins the transition to the Balkan routes. The road network of Asia Minor as documented in the Antonine Itinerary is the most detailed outside of Italy and Africa, reflecting the economic centrality of Anatolia to the Roman Empire. The total number of routes through Asia Minor in the itinerary exceeds 40, covering approximately 15,000 Roman miles of road. This network served military, commercial, and administrative purposes: the cursus publicus (imperial post) depended on these roads for communication between Rome and the eastern frontier.