Textus Originalis

ITALIA — GALLIA

Wess. 361, 1 Autesiodor m. p. XXXIII leug. XXII 2 Eburobrica m. p. XVIII leug. XII 3 Tricasis m. p. XXXIII leug. XXII 4 Artiaca m. p. XVIII leug. XII 5 Durocatelaunos m. p. XXXIII leug. XXII 362, 1 Durocortoro m. p. XXVII leug. XVIII 2 Suessonas m. p. XXXVII leug. XXV 3 Noviomago m. p. XXVII leug. XVIII 4 Ambianis m. p. XXXIIII leug. XXIII 363, 1 Pontibus m. p. XXXVI leug. XXIIII 2 Gesoriaco m. p. XXXVIIII leug. XXVI. 3 Item a Cavilunno Triveros. Wess. 363, 4 Item a Durocortoro Divodorum 5 usque m. p. LXXIIII: 364, 1 Basilia m. p. X 2 Axuena m. p. XII 3 Virodunum m. p. XVII 4 Fines m. p. VIIII 5 Ibliodurum m. p. VI 6 Divodurum m. p. VIII. 7 Alio itinere a Durocortoro Divodorum usque 8 m. p. LXXXVII, sic: 9 Fano Minervae m. p. XIIII 365, 1 Ariola m. p. XVI 2 Caturicis m. p. VIIII 3 Nasium m. p. VIIII 4 Tullum m. p. XVI 5 Scarponna m. p. X 6 Divodorum m. p. XII. 7 Item a Durocortoro Treveros 8 usque:

361, 1 Autesiodorum 362, 4 XXXVIIII XXVI 363, 5—364, 6 leugae 5 LXXIIII. Numeri collecti: LXII. Summam LXXIIII P, quia cum vera distantia bene congruit neque corruptela aut prava computatione facile oriri potuit, contra librorum DL consensum recepi. Suspicor igitur, et D et L sua sponte summam secundum numeros singulos mendosos correxisse, id quod ab eorum librorum indole minime abhorret. 364, 1—3 fere XLVI 4—6 fere XXVIII 7—365, 6 leugae 8 XCIII. Numeri collecti: LXXXVI, differunt a summa, quia, ut videtur, alicubi semisses sublati sunt. 9 XVIIII 365, 6 XIIII 8 fere XCV. Numeri collecti: XCIIII. Summa CXCVIIII ω (ex qua CXCVIII B leviter corrupta) cum singulis eorum librorum numeris mendosis (cf. 366, 3), si C errore librarii insuper additum tollis, convenit. Itaque archetypo tribui nequit. Quam L primum quidem correxit C superfluun demendo, deinde autem traditam summam restituit.

Traduzione

ITALY — GAUL

Wess. 361, 1 Autesiodor, m.p. XXXIII, leagues XXII 2 Eburobrica, m.p. XVIII, leagues XII 3 Tricasis, m.p. XXXIII, leagues XXII 4 Artiaca, m.p. XVIII, leagues XII 5 Durocatelaunos, m.p. XXXIII, leagues XXII 362, 1 Durocortoro, m.p. XXVII, leagues XVIII 2 Suessonas, m.p. XXXVII, leagues XXV 3 Noviomago, m.p. XXVII, leagues XVIII 4 Ambianis, m.p. XXXIIII, leagues XXIII 363, 1 Pontibus, m.p. XXXVI, leagues XXIIII 2 Gesoriaco, m.p. XXXVIIII, leagues XXVI. 3 Also from Cavilunno to Triveros. Wess. 363, 4 Also from Durocortoro as far as Divodorum 5 m.p. LXXIIII: 364, 1 Basilia, m.p. X 2 Axuena, m.p. XII 3 Virodunum, m.p. XVII 4 Fines, m.p. VIIII 5 Ibliodurum, m.p. VI 6 Divodurum, m.p. VIII. 7 By another route from Durocortoro as far as Divodorum 8 m.p. LXXXVII, as follows: 9 Fano Minervae, m.p. XIIII 365, 1 Ariola, m.p. XVI 2 Caturicis, m.p. VIIII 3 Nasium, m.p. VIIII 4 Tullum, m.p. XVI 5 Scarponna, m.p. X 6 Divodorum, m.p. XII. 7 Also from Durocortoro to Treveros 8 as far as:

361, 1 Autesiodorum 362, 4 XXXVIIII XXVI 363, 5—364, 6 leagues 5 LXXIIII. The sum of the individual figures: LXII. I have adopted the total LXXIIII from P, against the consensus of manuscripts DL, because it agrees well with the true distance and could not easily arise through corruption or faulty calculation. I suspect, therefore, that both D and L on their own corrected the total according to the corrupt individual figures, which is by no means inconsistent with the nature of those manuscripts. 364, 1—3 approximately XLVI 4—6 approximately XXVIII 7—365, 6 leagues 8 XCIII. The sum of the individual figures: LXXXVI, they differ from the total because, as it seems, half-miles were removed somewhere. 9 XVIIII 365, 6 XIIII 8 approximately XCV. The sum of the individual figures: XCIIII. The total CXCVIIII in ω (from which CXCVIII in B is slightly corrupted) agrees, if you remove the C added superfluously by a scribal error, with the corrupt individual figures of those manuscripts (cf. 366, 3). Therefore, it cannot be attributed to the archetype. L first indeed corrected it by removing the superfluous C, but then restored the transmitted total.