Textus Originalis

ITINERARIUM PROVINCIARUM

Wess. 365, 9 Vongo vicus leug. XXII 366, 1 Epoisso vicus leug. XXII 2 Orolauno vicus leug. XX 3 Andethannale vicus leug. XV 4 Treveros civitas leug. XV. 5 Ab Augustoduno Luticia Parisiorum 6 m. p. CLXXXVII: 7 Alisincum m. p. XXII 367, 1 Decetia m. p. XXIIII 2 Nevirnum m. p. XVI 3 Condate m. p. XXIIII 4 Bribodorum m. p. XVI 5 Belca m. p. XV 6 Canabum m. p. XXII Wess. 368, 1 Salioclita m. p. XXIIII 2 Luticia m. p. XXIIII. 3. 4 A Lugduno, caput Germaniarum, Argentorato: 369, 1 Albanianis m. p. X 2 Traiecto m. p. XVII 3 Mannaricio m. p. XV 4 Carvone m. p. XXII 5 Harenatio m. p. XXII 370, 1 Burginatio m. p. VI 2 Colonia Traiana m. p. V 3 Veteribus m. p. ∞ 4 Calone m. p. XVIII 5 Novesiae m. p. XVIII 6 Colonia Agrippina m. p. XVI 7 Bonna m. p. XI 371, 1 Antunnaco m. p. XVII 2 Confluentibus m. p. VIII

366, 2 fere XXI 6—368, 2 leugae 366, 6 fere CLXXIIII. Numeri collecti: CLXXXVII. Summa CLXXVII P levi corruptela ex CLXXXVII DL orta videtur. Sed quoniam ad veram distantiam prope accedit, fortasse idem hic iudicium ferendum est quod supra 363, 5: antiquiorem scilicet summam (computatam priusquam 367, 1 XIIII in XXIIII corrumperetur) P solum conservasse, D et L secundum numeros singulos mendosos correxisse. 367, 1 XIIII 4 fere XIII 6 Cenabum 368, 3. 4 capite. Leugae fere CCCLII. Numeri collecti: CCCXXXVIIII aut CCCXL. Summa CCCXXV ω quomodo orta sit non video. Sed hoc quidem certum, eam alienam esse ab archetypo, quippe quod numeri et traditi et veri maiorem efficiunt summam. L, ut multis aliis locis, primum summam secundum numeros suos mendosos correxit, deinde summam traditam ex parte restituit. 369, 1—372, 2 leugae 370, 3 I 4—5 XXVII 371, 2 VIII aut VIIII

Traduzione

ITINERARY OF THE PROVINCES

Wess. 365, 9 Vongo vicus, leagues XXII 366, 1 Epoisso vicus, leagues XXII 2 Orolauno vicus, leagues XX 3 Andethannale vicus, leagues XV 4 Treveros civitas, leagues XV. 5 From Augustoduno to Luticia Parisiorum 6 m.p. CLXXXVII: 7 Alisincum, m.p. XXII 367, 1 Decetia, m.p. XXIIII 2 Nevirnum, m.p. XVI 3 Condate, m.p. XXIIII 4 Bribodorum, m.p. XVI 5 Belca, m.p. XV 6 Canabum, m.p. XXII Wess. 368, 1 Salioclita, m.p. XXIIII 2 Luticia, m.p. XXIIII. 3. 4 From Lugduno, the capital of the Germanies, to Argentorato: 369, 1 Albanianis, m.p. X 2 Traiecto, m.p. XVII 3 Mannaricio, m.p. XV 4 Carvone, m.p. XXII 5 Harenatio, m.p. XXII 370, 1 Burginatio, m.p. VI 2 Colonia Traiana, m.p. V 3 Veteribus, m.p. I [= 1,000?] 4 Calone, m.p. XVIII 5 Novesiae, m.p. XVIII 6 Colonia Agrippina, m.p. XVI 7 Bonna, m.p. XI 371, 1 Antunnaco, m.p. XVII 2 Confluentibus, m.p. VIII

366, 2 approximately XXI 6—368, 2 leagues 366, 6 approximately CLXXIIII. The sum of the individual figures: CLXXXVII. The total CLXXVII in P seems to have arisen through a slight corruption from CLXXXVII in DL. But since it comes close to the true distance, perhaps the same judgment is to be made here as above at 363, 5: namely, that P alone preserved the older total (calculated before 367, 1 was corrupted from XIIII to XXIIII), and D and L corrected it according to the corrupt individual figures. 367, 1 XIIII 4 approximately XIII 6 Cenabum 368, 3. 4 the capital. Leagues approximately CCCLII. The sum of the individual figures: CCCXXXVIIII or CCCXL. I do not see how the total CCCXXV in ω arose. But this much is certain, that it is foreign to the archetype, since both the transmitted and the true figures give a larger total. L, as in many other places, first corrected the total according to its corrupt figures, then partially restored the transmitted total. 369, 1—372, 2 leagues 370, 3 I 4—5 XXVII 371, 2 VIII or VIIII