Textus Originalis

GALLIA

Wess. 371, 3 Vinco m. p. XXVI 4 Noviomago m. p. XXXIIII 5 Treveros m. p. XIII 6 Divodorum m. p. XXXIIII 372, 1 Ponte Sarvix m. p. XXIIII 2 Argentorato m. p. XXII. 3 A Treveros Agrippinam leug. LXVII, sic: 4 Beda vicus leug. XII 5 Ausava vicus leug. XII 373, 1 Egorigio vicus leug. XII 2 Marcomago vicus leug. VIII 3 Belgica leug. VIII 4 Tolbiaco vicus Sopenorum leug. X 5 Agrippina civitas leug. XVI. 374, 1 Item a Treveris Argentorato m. p. CXXVIII: Wess. 374, 2 Baudobrica m. p. XVIII 3 Salisione m. p. XXII 4 Vingio m. p. XXIII 5 Mogontiaco m. p. XII 6 Bormitomago m. p. XVI 7 Noviomago m. p. XVIII 8 Argentorato m. p. XVIIII. 375, 1 Item a Colonia Traiana Coloniam Agrippinam m. p. LXXI: 3 Mediolano m. p. VIII 4 Sablonibus m. p. VIII 5 Mederiacum m. p. X 6 Teudurum m. p. VIII 7 Coriovallum m. p. VII 8 Iuliaco m. p. XII 9 Tiberiacum m. p. VIII 376, 1 Colonia Agrippina m. p. X.

371, 3 Bingio 6 fere XXXVII 372, 1 Saravi fere XL 2 XXV 3 numeri collecti: LXXVIII, recte opinor. Ex qua summa LXVII L et LXVI PD corruptae videntur. 374, 1—8 leugae 1 CLXII. Numeri collecti: CXXVIII. L summam secundum numeros suos, qui CVIIII efficiunt, videtur correxisse, deinde traditam summam restituit. 4 Bingio 6 XX 8 XLVIIII. XVIII 1L est numerus versus antecedentis, cuius stationem codex omisit. 375, 2—376, 1 leugae 2 fere LXXV? Numeri collecti LXXI efficiunt. 3—5 fere XXX?

Traduzione

GAUL

Wess. 371, 3 Vinco, m.p. XXVI 4 Noviomago, m.p. XXXIIII 5 Treveros, m.p. XIII 6 Divodorum, m.p. XXXIIII 372, 1 Ponte Sarvix, m.p. XXIIII 2 Argentorato, m.p. XXII. 3 From Treveros to Agrippinam, leagues LXVII, as follows: 4 Beda vicus, leagues XII 5 Ausava vicus, leagues XII 373, 1 Egorigio vicus, leagues XII 2 Marcomago vicus, leagues VIII 3 Belgica, leagues VIII 4 Tolbiaco vicus Sopenorum, leagues X 5 Agrippina civitas, leagues XVI. 374, 1 Also from Treveris to Argentorato, m.p. CXXVIII: Wess. 374, 2 Baudobrica, m.p. XVIII 3 Salisione, m.p. XXII 4 Vingio, m.p. XXIII 5 Mogontiaco, m.p. XII 6 Bormitomago, m.p. XVI 7 Noviomago, m.p. XVIII 8 Argentorato, m.p. XVIIII. 375, 1 Also from Colonia Traiana to Coloniam Agrippinam, m.p. LXXI: 3 Mediolano, m.p. VIII 4 Sablonibus, m.p. VIII 5 Mederiacum, m.p. X 6 Teudurum, m.p. VIII 7 Coriovallum, m.p. VII 8 Iuliaco, m.p. XII 9 Tiberiacum, m.p. VIII 376, 1 Colonia Agrippina, m.p. X.

371, 3 Bingio 6 approximately XXXVII 372, 1 Saravi approximately XL 2 XXV 3 the sum of the individual figures: LXXVIII, correctly I think. From this total, LXVII in L and LXVI in PD seem corrupted. 374, 1—8 leagues 1 CLXII. The sum of the individual figures: CXXVIII. L seems to have corrected the total according to its figures, which give CVIIII, then restored the transmitted total. 4 Bingio 6 XX 8 XLVIIII. XVIII in 1L is the number of the preceding line, the station of which the manuscript omitted. 375, 2—376, 1 leagues 2 approximately LXXV? The sum of the individual figures gives LXXI. 3—5 approximately XXX?